“Property is one of the basic ideas of Western liberal democracy. It is also fundamental to our economic system. If you don’t have security of property, you don’t have much.” ~ Professor Bruce Pardy

Law professor Bruce Pardy supports the idea that independence would mean rejecting the existing constitutional order, including treaty and Aboriginal rights, and offers a perspective that independence could provide an opportunity to address outdated concepts.

Prof. Bruce Pardy at Fundamental Truths: What’s the principle that distinguishes a parent signing off on a leg amputation from refusing a vaccine—and the state forcing it?

Law should not enforce unprovable moral propositions that ignore society’s diversity. Instead, it should prevent harm while allowing everyone to pursue their own truths—without coercion. [A presentation by Prof. Bruce Pardy].

Like the proverb says, make yourself into a doormat and someone will walk all over you.

The notion that individuals of certain descent belong to a different legal category is an idea Professor Bruce Pardy stresses “we have to do away with.”

Bruce Pardy: Bill 14 removed one obstacle but installed a new gatekeeper. Is this real progress for Alberta sovereignty — or a clever trap to defuse the movement without ever letting it succeed?

Ezra Levant sits down with Prof. Bruce Pardy, head of Rights Probe, for a hard-hitting discussion on free speech erosion, anarcho-tyranny, UNDRIP’s impact on property rights, and why Canada’s governance framework empowers unlimited state control over individual liberties.

Professor Bruce Pardy exposes how governments evaded judicial scrutiny during COVID by rendering challenges moot, eroding bodily autonomy and the rule of law. His bold vision for an independent Alberta flips the script: time for true autonomy over endless state overreach.

How can a society abandon liberalism almost without realizing it?

Brace yourselves.

Bruce Pardy: Section 43, which allows province-specific amendments, won't provide the answer.

As Canada debates bills C-8 and C-9, the U.K. serves as a stark warning for the potential consequences of poorly crafted laws.

In a striking contradiction, the federal government is urging the Supreme Court to limit the use of the Charter’s “notwithstanding clause” while simultaneously introducing the “Combatting Hate Act,” which threatens free speech without invoking this very clause. Thus, raising the critical question: in Canada, who truly safeguards individual liberties?

Alberta law prevents a vote for genuine independence.

British Columbians have had their heads in the sand as the premier mounts an existential threat to the future of his own province, but they are waking up.

Professor Bruce Pardy explores the paradox that is Bill C-9, the “Combatting Hate Act,” in his testimony to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

Experts tell Justice Committee the bill lowers safeguards against abuse and erodes free expression.

Professor Bruce Pardy explains why a truly free society is risky — and why that risk is necessary for genuine virtue and responsibility.

Bruce Pardy: A B.C. Supreme Court ruling that the Cowichan First Nation holds Aboriginal title over 800 acres of government land affirms that Aboriginal rights take precedence over unprotected private property rights in Canada.