We are approaching the moment when state and society become indistinguishable, and legal norms and expectations irrelevant. How do we escape?

Bill C-63, the Liberal government’s online harms act, would give an overpowered bureaucracy further control over our lives.

How the rule of law gave way to the managerial state. New from Bruce Pardy.

Life sentences for speech? Pre-crime detention? Ex post facto law? Anonymous accusers? It’s all in Justin Trudeau’s “Online Harms Act,” a true “threat to democracy.”

Psychologists, law professors and legislators denounce C-63 as an “attack on the very idea of freedom of expression.”

Bruce Pardy and Konstantin Kisin join Jordan Peterson to unpack Bill C-63, or as Jordan describes it: “the most totalitarian Western bill I’ve ever seen by quite a large margin and in multiple dimensions.”

An investigative film premiering in May looks at how decisions led to lockdown during Covid, and to the coverup of the origin of the virus.

The Dissident Herd of Cats is an indication of the absolute and utter rot of the universities.

This is only the latest episode in the feckless and invertebrate failure of our governments to produce and enact a serious plan to address legitimate grievances of the indigenous people.

Despite our own long tradition of “no taxation without representation,” courts in Canada increasingly dictate to governments how to spend taxpayer dollars.

A continuing conversation: the work to defend freedom and whether traditionalists and libertarians can find ways to join together in its defense.

Are federally appointed judges standing up more to the executive and legislative branches in Ottawa or does a departure from the default of deference depend on whether decisions are progressive or not?

Nathan Cullen says there’s no veto. But Cullen has a problem. Any activity that requires your consent is an activity over which you have a veto.

A double standard that became the ethos of modern social justice turns the tables on the politics of inclusion.

UNDRIP-inspired land law reforms are poised to turn B.C. into an untenable host for mining, forestry and much more.

Agreements will override national sovereignty because their provisions will be binding, say critics. But international law is the art of the Big Pretend. Bruce Pardy investigates.

In his willingness to fight back, Jordan Peterson, a polemicist who is unafraid, represents “a problem for the mob and a danger to a system that relies on cultural repression to advance its agenda.”

The decision may help to pull Canada back from the brink of authoritarian rule, but there’s a wrinkle in the works.

If the WEF and WHO have their way with censorship, nobody will know what's really going on in the world. Independent journalist Keri Molloy finds confusion abounds over national and individual sovereignty. Professor Pardy sounds the alarm.

The appeal rejected, what now? Jordan Peterson vows: “We’re going to perform that dance on the international stage, with all that light shining on your machinations, and you may well come to rue the day you attempted to take possession of my tongue.”