Remember that the next time you're waiting to see your newly minted doctor.

Equality rights in Canada have become weapons wielded by preferred groups to demand advantageous outcomes.

Bruce Pardy looks at why the legal system is not working the way it should, as well as the impact of the deep state, and how governments are being compromised.

In 1972, Team Canada was fighting for our way of life against an adversary who sought to tear it down. That foe is back and, this time, our team has switched sides.

Canadian business leaders eagerly jumped on the climate and ESG bandwagons. Bill C-59 has pushed them off. New from Bruce Pardy.

The game of Global Public Health is not played on a baseball diamond. But the game is real, and so are the players. Who made the team, who’s out, who’s up to bat, and what’s the goal? Bruce Pardy breaks it down.

We are approaching the moment when state and society become indistinguishable, and legal norms and expectations irrelevant. How do we escape?

Bill C-63, the Liberal government’s online harms act, would give an overpowered bureaucracy further control over our lives.

How the rule of law gave way to the managerial state. New from Bruce Pardy.

Life sentences for speech? Pre-crime detention? Ex post facto law? Anonymous accusers? It’s all in Justin Trudeau’s “Online Harms Act,” a true “threat to democracy.”

Psychologists, law professors and legislators denounce C-63 as an “attack on the very idea of freedom of expression.”

Bruce Pardy and Konstantin Kisin join Jordan Peterson to unpack Bill C-63, or as Jordan describes it: “the most totalitarian Western bill I’ve ever seen by quite a large margin and in multiple dimensions.”

An investigative film premiering in May looks at how decisions led to lockdown during Covid, and to the coverup of the origin of the virus.

The Dissident Herd of Cats is an indication of the absolute and utter rot of the universities.

This is only the latest episode in the feckless and invertebrate failure of our governments to produce and enact a serious plan to address legitimate grievances of the indigenous people.

Despite our own long tradition of “no taxation without representation,” courts in Canada increasingly dictate to governments how to spend taxpayer dollars.

A continuing conversation: the work to defend freedom and whether traditionalists and libertarians can find ways to join together in its defense.

Are federally appointed judges standing up more to the executive and legislative branches in Ottawa or does a departure from the default of deference depend on whether decisions are progressive or not?

Nathan Cullen says there’s no veto. But Cullen has a problem. Any activity that requires your consent is an activity over which you have a veto.

A double standard that became the ethos of modern social justice turns the tables on the politics of inclusion.